Because an injunction “prohibits conduct under threat of judicial punishment, basic fairness requires that those enjoined receive explicit notice of precisely what conduct is outlawed.” Under this standard, we have held injunctions to be too vague when they enjoin all violations of a statute in the abstract without any further specification, or when they include, as a necessary descriptor of the forbidden conduct, an undefined term that the circumstances of the case do not clarify.
Indeed, we must always apply the fair notice requirement “in the light of the circumstances surrounding entry: the relief sought by the moving party, the evidence produced at the hearing on the injunction, and the mischief that the injunction seeks to prevent.”
End of Year Thoughts: Why are So Many Anti-Tobacco Groups Attacking a
Product with Few Acute Risks, But Saying Nothing About Truly Risky Tobacco
Products?
-
Why are so many anti-tobacco groups attacking electronic cigarettes (and to
some degree nicotine pouches) but saying little about the risks of much
more ...
4 days ago
